中澳移民留学

In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society?

Coupled with the rapid development in medical science and life quality, people are able to live longer, and the proportion of old people are rising at a steady pace. However, whether it has more positive or negative impacts is certainly a contentious one.

Granted, with the increase of senior citizens, the younger generation acquire more opportunities to spend time with their senior relatives. They could enjoy a large family gathering, sharing their happiness, sadness and problems  with the their great grandparents, during which time they might occasionally acquire several pieces of valuable advice. The rich experiences of the senior members could possibly inspire the junior ones to develop a different way to  cope with grumpy superiors in workplace, for example,writing a long and heart-touching email to an angry boss rather than confronting with him directly. 

However, beneath the seemingly advantageous surface, tremendous negative impacts are troubling and even possibly haunting both individual families and the whole society.  Chief among the problems is the huge financial burden imposed on the younger parents who have to support four or even more orderly members along with their children. They have to pay the utility bills, buy daily necessities,  pay for the intimidating medical expense, or even hire nurses to help them to take care of their senior members, the expense of which could sometimes exceed their yearly income. Another negative influences of rising ratio of old people is that the development of society are slowing down. In particular, the lack of vigorous work force (beyond doubt, most of the elderly are weak in physical strength and not able to engage in labor demanding jobs) are hindering the development of social economy and industry. For example, in China, though it has the largest population in the world, there is a serious shortage of labor-intensive workers in most of areas including construction sites and factories, hindering the further advancement of country.

By way of conclusion, the problems involved in the continuously climbing proportion of aged people far outweigh its benefits, considering the undue financial pressure on families  and the slower development of society.

Some groups, such as poor people and people from rural areas, think universities should make it especially easy for them to get access to university education. To what extent do you agree or disagree？

When it comes to the disadvantaged groups in the society, people always believe that they should be given special concern in various fields including higher education. As far as I am concerned, the disprivilagd students, such as those who live in poverty, should be cared for, but not given privileges in terms of entry to universities.

Some people, with a compassionate attitude toward students from poor families and rural areas, attempt to justify the educational privilege offered by universities to them, reasoning that it will help to compensate for the deficiency of their previous education. It is beyond dispute that educational diaparities do exist in different social groups. To illustrate, the less developed regions may not have been provided with sufficient facilities for education, i.e. schools and classrooms, and high tuition fees have denied poor students’ access to some renowned learning institutes. However, both those problems should be fixed by the government in the primary and secondary phases of their education. It is simply not reasonable to leave this responsibility to universities, which, as is known to all, are the place for scientific research and higher education.

Further, there would be problems if certain social groups were granted with exceptional advantages in college education. For one thing, it is a violation of the priciple of fair competition; for another, students admitted to a university without adequate knowledge and skills will be likely to feel inferior to the other students, which will consequently result in some psychological problems.

To draw a conclusion, sympathy to the less privileged groups is understandable, but the proper approach to solve their educational problems is to invest more in the teaching and learning facilities available to them, so as to equip them with equal eligibility for being admitted to universities.
(294words)

Some people think younger people are not suitable for important positions in government. Others think it will be a good idea for younger people to take on these positions. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Topic 1: choosing a suitable career is a problem that faces many young people. What are the reasons? What suggestion would you give to them to help them make the right decision?

Some people think all law breakers should be put into prison.Others believe that there are better alternatives.Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people believe that there are better methods to deal with law breakers, while others think all law breakers should be put into prison. In my point of view, both of them are one-sided, since punishments used by many countries in the world today are indeed varied, including but not limited to: imprisonment, fines, custodial training, etc.
    Traditionally, when a person commits crimes either intended or unintended, he or she will be detained administratively or criminally in prison, waiting for a local or senior court to decide the final penalty. That final decision could be longer days in prison, certain amount of forfeitures, sometimes even the death penalty. Since ancient times, rulers have found these ways useful, not only causing the law breaker material and spiritual losses, but also making compensations for the victims, while achieving the goal of warning the common people.
    However, opposing critics still find the punishments “insufficient”, which merely cause superficial wastage while not being enough to purify the whole society. Thus, alternative penalties have been implemented, when courts makes their decisions, they consider more about how to maximize the educational effect instead of making punishments a mere formality. In western countries, some courts even invite priests to educate the guilty.
    I think apart from imprisonment and custodial training, it is worthwhile for governments to consider novel ways to punish law breakers, for example, writing remorse letters, free laboring for compensation, and so on. Perhaps the current judicial system simply put too much attention on following routine procedures, while ignoring the true needs of our victims. In the future, the main court can try inviting the victims to take part in the ruling procedure, and make punishments more effective and coping with the popular conviction.

我只想说下面这个小哥，不做死就不会死！

中国大陆雅思，明文规定，一个考生，前后两次分数相差1.5分以上就会被调查，从2008年12月开始，然后大概到了2013年左右，笔试和口语分数相差大都会被调查，再后来就是听力和写作分数差别大，都会被调查！

现在我快急死了
        我不知道后面会发生什么情况 局势也开始变得我无法控制
        请求大家给我点建议：

        1 我自己有很强烈的出国想法 于是报名参加雅思考试

        2 复习雅思并报名考了两次之后 发现成绩仍然不如自己期望那么高
        我要的成绩是总分6.5 最低项6.0
        我考了两次都没到线

        3 于是我想
        第三次不论发生什么情况以什么代价 我一定要拿到我期望的成绩
        在这样的动机之下 我网上找了替考
        他是上海某所著名高校的英语专业研究生 英文非常好

        4 去年的某天他去参加了考试 我门口候考
        考完我就请他吃了一顿
        整个考试从笔试开始到口试结束没有任何问题。

        5 10个工作日以后我网上查到了雅思成绩
        我简直不敢相信我的眼睛
        听力和阅读接近全满分 总分非常高
        当时我就对替考介绍人发飚
        这样的成绩是足够申请LSE 普林斯顿了
        但是很明显 不是我自己的英语水平
        而且我自己后期再怎么温习也没法catch up 上这一成绩。

        6 尽管出现了纰漏 但是我仍然按照事先约定付了款
        中介说如果再考一次 必须另外在收一次款

        7 我拿着这个非常高的成绩申请了学校
        顺利的申请到了某所其实不是很好的境外学校的offer
        签证和一切手续在顺利进行中
        其他一切手续都是我本人真实的身份

        8 我在付款给替考的当时我就提出我会自己在考次雅思
        一是为了提高自己英语水平
        二是为了使我这个非常高的成绩看上去不那么假

        9 于是我报名参加了今年的某次雅思考试
        在成绩出来的前一天 我考多少分不重要
        上海雅思考试中心打电话给我
        限我在某月某号之前
        也没说我的英文水平差距有多大
        就说我两次考试的笔迹不一致 怀疑是伪造的

        10 但是我现在的情况是 人已经在国外了
        我在这里已经开始了我的新生活
        并且短期内也不会再回到上海
        当然我心里也知道 如果我很听话的回去了
        很有可能就再也出不了国 直接永久禁考雅思+上他们的黑名单了

        11 我现在担心的是
        我现在就读的学校会不会知道我的成绩有水分
        进而取消我的学生签证
        我在现在这里都是有我的亲戚的 长辈很多
        这件事情从头到尾都是我一个人做的。
        被长辈知道 我是这么出国的我就死定了
        以后不管在这里还是在国内都完了。

        12 最后一点我要问的是
        我现在已经办好了我的入学注册手续
        如果我现在雅思成绩被上海考试中心因为伪造而取消
        会影响到我的学习签证吗？
        取消的话是取消一次的还是几次都被取消？
        我是不是还能够在我现在这里继续呆下去？？
        会不会严重到 “限期离境”？？

Children can learn effectively from watching television. Therefore, children should be encouraged to watch television both at home and at school. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, the education system faces the challenges of training globalized and well-rounded young candidates for the society. Although more and more academic disciplines and subjects are being introduced in schools and universities, students still face the reality of a competitive job market. Among the listed subjects, I think that literature is the least important and foreign languages are the most important.

Some people think humans can exploit animals for any purpose that they need while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion?

When it comes to the relationship between animals and human beings, quite a few people declare that human beings are entitled to exploit animals for whatever purpose they want, while others consider it otherwise. Personally, I side with the latter. 

Advocates for freely exploring animals claim that, just like wolves to sheep, humans are on the superior to all animals. In their opinion, they should be allowed to take any advantage from any animal, including feeding on dogs’ meat, manufacturing clothes out of foxes’ fur and conducting medical experiments on alive mice. However, there is no such thing as superiority in nature. Each animal species, be it little frog in a farming field or massive tiger in a remote mountain, plays an irreplaceable part in its food chain and helps to maintain the balance of the nature.Without animals, the ecological system would be destroyed and human beings would not be able to survive in the future. 

Exploiting animals at will should not be permitted, and the two main reasons are as follows. First of all, some exploiting behaviors from human beings completely ignores the pain or even the death of animals.  In the case of extracting gall from alive bears, the bears feel extremely intensive pain, lying hopelessly in the cage, with blood flowing out from the bitter wounds on the chest and tears welling out off its innocent eyes. No civilized person would approve such brutal cases.  Second of all,  most of human’s activities of exploiting animals are not necessary. For example, the clothes of artificial furs, mostly made from fiber, provide equal warming and dressing effect with those of furs which human beings tripped mercilessly off alive foxes and rabbits. Besides, there have already been plenty of vegetarians worldwide, relying on bean products to satisfy their protein needs and living healthily, which means human beings can do without the meat from animals.

In conclusion, human beings should not exploit animals at will as some of human activities involving animals are too brutal to be approved and there are plenty of substitutes for the so-called necessary activities.

When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life dies out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

As the development of science and technology upgrading itself at a daily basis, some conventional skills and ways of life have been replaced by the latest ones. In my personal opinion, with the invention of more advanced technologies, there is no point to keep most of the traditional skills and ways of living with only a few exceptions.